BiologicTheoryRevolutionizing CRSwNPCare Education

This abstract has open access
Abstract Description
Abstract ID :
HAC696
Submission Type
Authors: (including presenting author): :
Tai CE(1), Emily Leung(2)
Affiliation: :
(1) M&G, Tuen Mun Hospital, (2) ENT, Tuen Mun Hospital
Keyword 1: :
CRSwNP
Keyword 2: :
BiologicTheory
Introduction: :
Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) generally have a high symptom burden and poor health-related quality of life, often requiring recurring systemic corticosteroid use and repeated sinus surgery. The Global prevalence of CRSwNP is estimated to be 1%–4%. However, for local treatments, such as surgery, do not target the underlying type 2 inflammation in the sinuses, and can lead to high rates of recurrence, revision surgery, and unsustainable improvements in loss of sense of smell. Biologic CRSwNP treatment are to achieve effective and sustained symptom control, minimise recurrence of polyps, and attain better control of comorbid lower airway disease while minimising the risk of side-effects associated with systemic corticosteroid uses and repeated sinus surgery.
Objectives: :
Monitor biologics to reduce poly size, symptoms, and steroid needs while improving quality of life
Methodology: :
Recruited patients with evidence of type II inflammation disease including chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, eosinophilic asthma, considering or receiving biological therapies to combined airway clinic (collaboration between ENT & respiratory team) for management. We selected the appropriately patients for biological treatment in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP): Presence of bilateral polyps in a patient who had Endoscopic Sinus Surgery and exceptional circumstances excluded (e.g., not fit for surgery) Three criteria: Evidence of type 2 inflammation: Tissue eosinophils ≥10/hpf, OR blood eos ≥150u/l, OR total IgE ≥100IU/ml  Need for systemic corticosteroids or contraindication to systemic steroids: ≥ 2 courses per year OR long term (>3 months) low dose steroids  Significantly impaired quality of life: SNOT-22 ≥ 40  Significant loss of smell: Anosmic on smell test (score depending on test)  Diagnosis of comorbid asthma: Asthma needing regular ICS
Result & Outcome: :
Totally 12 patients had recruited for education on biologic therapy Jan 2024- Dec 2025  Significant improvements in loss of smell in patients after the first dose  Significantly reduced polyp size and improved sinus disease  Improvements in cardinal CRSwNP symptoms (eg, nasal congestion, loss of smell, rhinorrhea), and severity of disease After recruited for education on biologic therapy, educate the patient about the potential benefits of biologic therapy, such as reduced polyp size and improved sinus disease, and decreased reliance on other asthma medications. Also, discuss possible risks and side effects associated with biologic treatment and how they can be managed. Thus although wider availability of current biologics are needed, additional pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions are still required. Careful phenotypic assessment of patients including current and novel predictive biomarkers will help to choose the best biologic for each patient and guide decisions on early switching if required. Regular communication and follow-up with healthcare professionals are essential to address any questions or concerns that may arise during the course of biologic therapy.
NC
,
Tuen Mun Hospital

Abstracts With Same Type

8 visits